Four Presidents, One Outcome: The Decades of Betrayals that Led to Trump

How the American Political Establishment Produced Its Own Disruption

Here's a story you already know, even if you've never heard it told this way. Every few years, someone shows up and says: I'm one of you. I understand your life because I've lived it. Trust me with power, and I'll fight for you.

You believe them. Not because you're gullible, but because the performance is that good. Because you want it to be true. Because the alternative—that the whole thing is a show—is too bleak to sit with.

So you vote and they win. And then the shift begins, often in ways that draw little attention. A provision added to a bill. A regulatory rollback. A vote that passes without the language that once accompanied it on the campaign trail. The divergence is not always dramatic, but it's there, and it accumulates.

And when it's over—when the damage is done and the next election rolls around—someone new shows up. A different face, a different party, sometimes, but the pitch is the same: I'm one of you.

This pattern does not require a grand theory to explain it. It’s a confidence game, one that is dependent on trust that is carefully built and repeatedly leveraged. In American politics, that trust is often forged through identity and the suggestion that shared background will produce shared outcomes.

The record, over time, tells a more complicated story. Four presidents, four distinct identities and a single recurring result.

Bill Clinton: The Boy from Hope

The Performance

In June 1992, a governor from Arkansas appeared on The Arsenio Hall Show wearing dark sunglasses and carrying a tenor saxophone. He played “Heartbreak Hotel” and “God Bless the Child.” The performance lasted only a few minutes, but it reshaped how a presidential candidate could present himself. He made half of America feel like he was their friend.

The image was supported by a biography that translated easily across audiences. He was born in Hope, Arkansas and raised by a single mother. His stepfather struggled with alcoholism. 

He grew up with limited means in the South, in close proximity to Black communities that would later recognize elements of their own experience in his story. The trajectory that followed—Rhodes Scholarship, Yale Law School and a political ascent alongside Hillary Rodham Clinton—completed a narrative that was both aspirational and legible: a life that moved from constraint to influence.

In the three-way race of 1992, Clinton’s appeal rested in part on that sense of proximity. He drew back white working-class voters who had shifted during the Reagan years and built deep support among Black Americans.

In 1998, writing in The New Yorker, Toni Morrison described him as “our first Black president,” noting that "Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald's-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas."

Morrison later expressed regret over how that phrase was weaponized as a compliment. She'd written it during Clinton's impeachment, as a commentary on how he was being persecuted the way America persecutes Black men. It was an observation about how the establishment treated him, not an endorsement of how he treated Black America.

That distinction sits at the center of what followed, and what Clinton did to the people who loved him is the first chapter of this story.

The Betrayal

The jobs: Clinton promised NAFTA would create 200,000 American jobs in two years and a million within five. The Economic Policy Institute later estimated NAFTA caused a net loss of approximately 700,000 U.S. jobs, with 61% in manufacturing.

The hardest-hit states were Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Indiana—the same states that would elect Donald Trump nearly twenty years later.

But NAFTA was just the beginning. Clinton also pushed through the Uruguay Round of GATT, creating the World Trade Organization, and in 2000 signed Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China—laying the groundwork for what economists would later call the "China Shock," an estimated 3.7 million additional American jobs lost to Chinese trade between 2001 and 2018.

The incarceration: In 1994, Clinton signed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, which established a federal "three strikes" law, funded $9.7 billion in new prisons, expanded the death penalty to 60 additional offenses and eliminated Pell Grants for prisoners. 

The U.S. prison population nearly doubled through the 1990s, and Black Americans were incarcerated at five times the rate of whites. By 2001, one in six Black men had been incarcerated.

The "first Black president" signed a law that caged the community that loved him most. Clinton himself acknowledged it in 2015: "I signed a bill that made the problem worse."

The safety net: In 1996, Clinton declared "Today we are ending welfare as we know it" and signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act, replacing AFDC with TANF. 

Caseloads fell 76%, from 4.4 million families to 1.1 million. In 1996, 68 families received assistance for every 100 families in poverty. By 2019, that number was 23.

 The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities documented that 52% of Black children now live in states with TANF benefits at or below 20% of the poverty line. The bill pushed millions of families into what economists call "deep poverty"—below 50% of the poverty line.

The narrative: On February 8, 1996, Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act, which was the first major overhaul of telecom law since 1934. It removed cross-ownership restrictions and unleashed a wave of media consolidation that transformed American information. In 1983, fifty companies controlled 90% of U.S. media.

By 2011, six companies controlled 90%. Fewer owners meant fewer editorial voices, which meant fewer people asking hard questions about what was happening to the economy, the legal system, and the people at the bottom.

The Architecture

Here's where it gets technical, but stay with me because this is where the real money moved.

The ownership trick: In 1994, the Uniform Law Commission and the American Law Institute rewrote Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code—the law governing who owns investment securities. 

The revision, adopted quietly by state legislatures across the country between 1994 and 2004 under both Clinton and Bush, did something most Americans still don't know: it eliminated your direct property rights to the stocks and bonds in your brokerage account.

Before the revision, if you bought shares of a company, you owned them. After the revision, you held something called a "security entitlement”, a contractual claim through an intermediary. Your broker could now legally “rehypothecate” your securities, which means to use them as collateral for the broker's own borrowing. 

And if that broker went bankrupt, the broker's creditors could have a superior claim to your securities.

This wasn't a secret, it's in the statute books of all fifty states. But it was buried in language so technical that most state legislators who voted for it didn't understand what they were approving. 

As David Rogers Webb documented in The Great Taking, the revision "fundamentally eroded Americans' property rights to their own investments" — and it was enacted "with little to no public awareness."

The banking firewall: On November 12, 1999, Clinton signed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, repealing the Glass-Steagall Act. Glass-Steagall, passed during FDR's first hundred days in 1933, had separated commercial banking from investment banking for sixty-six years. It was the firewall that prevented banks from gambling with your deposits. Clinton removed it.

The immediate result was the Citigroup merger, which was a $70 billion deal combining Citicorp with Travelers Group (which included Salomon Smith Barney). The deal had been technically illegal under Glass-Steagall. The repeal made it legal retroactively.

The derivatives bomb: On December 21, 2000, Cliton signed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which exempted over-the-counter derivatives, including credit default swaps, from virtually all regulation.

 The OTC derivatives market grew completely unregulated from approximately $88 trillion in 1999 to $672 trillion by 2008. AIG alone sold $440 billion in credit default swaps. When the housing market collapsed, AIG couldn't pay.

The Sequence

Each of these moves enabled the next. NAFTA gutted manufacturing jobs. The Telecom Act consolidated media so fewer people reported on the UCC changes.

The UCC revision gave Wall Street the legal infrastructure to use customer securities as collateral. Glass-Steagall's repeal let banks merge into "too big to fail" conglomerates. The CFMA deregulated the derivatives that weaponized it all.

This wasn't a series of unrelated policy decisions. It was intentionally crafted architecture.

The Payoff

When Clinton left office in January 2001, he established his presidential office at 55 West 125th Street in Harlem—still performing his proximity to Black community even in post-presidency.

Hillary Clinton entered the New York Senate race in 2000. Her top donors were Citigroup and Goldman Sachs—the primary beneficiaries of Glass-Steagall repeal. Goldman contributed $711,000 to her campaign. She raised $1.18 million from the securities and investment industry alone—at the time, the second-highest total ever for a Senate candidate.

The Clintons went on to earn $153 million in speaking fees between 2001 and 2015. Hillary alone received $675,000 for three Goldman Sachs speeches.  The Clinton Global Initiative drew major Wall Street donors.

Follow the money. Deregulate Wall Street → Wall Street funds your wife's political career and your post-presidency → the people who voted for you lose their jobs, their homes and eventually their retirement savings.

George W. Bush: The Rancher from Crawford

The Performance

George W. Bush entered national politics with a carefully shaped image: a plainspoken Texas rancher, a “compassionate conservative” and a man of faith who seemed accessible, even familiar. The persona suggested ease and informality, someone who could move comfortably among voters who valued both. He was the guy you wanted to have a beer with. 

The reality is that he was born in New Haven, Connecticut into a family long embedded in American political life. He was the son of a president and the grandson of a senator. He attended Phillips Academy Andover—one of the most elite prep schools in America—and then Yale, where he was a member of Skull and Bones, followed by Harvard Business School. The arc placed him firmly within the country’s northeastern establishment.

The setting that came to define his public image was assembled later. Prairie Chapel Ranch, a 1,583-acre property near Crawford, Texas, was purchased in 1999, the year he began his presidential campaign. It quickly became a recurring backdrop, dubbed by many as the “Western White House.”  

Photographs and television footage showed Bush clearing brush in jeans and work boots, offering a visual shorthand that resonated with evangelical voters, military families and rural communities.

"Compassionate conservatism" was, as Nicholas Lemann wrote in The New Yorker, "brilliantly vague.” Liberals heard it as 'I'm not all that conservative,' and conservatives heard it as 'I'm deeply religious.” It was a blank screen. Everyone saw what they needed to see.

The Betrayal

The wars: Bush's most loyal base—military families, rural communities and working-class patriots—sent their sons and daughters to Afghanistan and Iraq. The Iraq War was launched on the premise of weapons of mass destruction that were never found. By the end of Bush's presidency 4,431 Americans were killed in Iraq, 2,448 in Afghanistan and tens of thousands were wounded. The human cost was borne almost entirely by the communities that voted for him.

The legal architecture: While America was focused on the wars, the financial infrastructure continued to take shape. The adoption of revised UCC Article 8—stripping Americans' ownership rights to their securities—was completed during Bush's first term.

Then, in April 2005, Bush signed the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. It was marketed as cracking down on ordinary Americans who were abusing the bankruptcy system, making it harder for working families to discharge debts, including the credit card debts pushed by companies like MBNA.

But buried inside the bill was something far more consequential: a massive expansion of the derivatives "safe harbor" provisions. This created a new class of secured creditor with what Harvard Law scholars Steven Schwarcz and Ori Sharon described as "virtually unlimited enforcement rights against the debtor"—the result of "decades of sustained industry pressure on Congress."

Here's what that means in plain English: if a bank demands collateral from a failing firm, and that collateral includes securities that belong to the firm's clients, the bank's claim is legally unimpeachable. Even if the transfer would otherwise constitute constructive fraud. The bankruptcy trustee cannot claw it back.

The crash: The architecture was now complete. Wall Street designed collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) built from subprime mortgages. Rating agencies gave them AAA ratings, which was critical because pension funds and money markets were legally restricted to buying only AAA-rated securities. The pension funds bought the bomb because the rating on the label said it was safe.¹⁹

When the housing market collapsed, the bomb detonated. The OECD estimated that private pension funds worldwide lost $5 trillion in 2008. U.S. public pension funds lost $889 billion.²⁰ 

The retirement savings of working Americans—the firefighters, teachers and factory workers who trusted the system—were destroyed by instruments that couldn't have existed without the legal architecture built across the Clinton and Bush administrations.

The Proof of Concept: Lehman Brothers

On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptc —$639 billion in assets, the largest bankruptcy in American history.

What most people don't know is what happened to Lehman's clients' money.

Lehman Brothers International Europe held close to $40 billion in client assets through its prime brokerage services.²¹ 

To meet its own credit needs, Lehman routinely rehypothecated those assets using securities that belonged to hedge funds and other clients as collateral for Lehman's own borrowing.

In the UK, where LBIE operated, there was no regulatory limit on rehypothecation. By September 12, LBIE had rehypothecated most of its clients' assets.

In the days before the filing, JP Morgan Chase—Lehman's primary clearing bank—demanded $5 billion in additional collateral, citing a need for an "extra cushion."

 JP Morgan promised to return the money at close of settlement on Friday, September 12. It never did. By that date, JP Morgan held $8.6 billion in cash and collateral from Lehman.²³

When Lehman collapsed, all client assets were frozen. PricewaterhouseCoopers, the LBIE administrators, confirmed that client assets had been rehypothecated and were "no longer held for the client on a segregated basis"—meaning, in their words, "the client may no longer have a proprietary interest in the assets."

Read that again. Clients who believed they owned their securities were told they might not have a proprietary interest in their own property. Under UCC Article 8, they held "security entitlements," not ownership. Under the safe harbor provisions, JP Morgan's claim was superior. The clients became unsecured creditors—last in line.

JP Morgan settled with the Lehman estate in 2016 for $1.42 billion. But no one was found to have acted illegally. The safe harbor made it legal. The UCC revision made it possible. The architecture worked exactly as designed.

The Rehabilitation

George W. Bush left office with a 33% approval rating, which was among the lowest in modern history. The wars, the crash, Katrina, the national debt doubled from $5.8 trillion to $11.9 trillion.

By 2018, his favorability had risen to 61%.

How? Partly through contrast with Trump—suddenly Bush was the "reasonable" Republican. Partly through soft-focus rehabilitation: the paintings, the friendship with Michelle Obama, the candy passed at funerals. 

The man who launched wars on false pretenses and completed the legal architecture for the greatest financial theft in American history was rebranded as a lovable elder statesman.

We'll come back to that.

Barack Obama: Hope and Change

The Performance

No one in modern American politics has performed identity more effectively than Barack Obama.

Son of a Kenyan father and a Kansas mother. Raised in Hawaii and Indonesia. Columbia University, then two years as a community organizer on Chicago's impoverished South Side, then Harvard Law where he became the first Black president of the Law Review. He married Michelle Robinson, a Chicago South Side native. He taught constitutional law. He joined a Black church.

The 2004 Democratic National Convention keynote did what Clinton's saxophone had done twelve years earlier, but bigger: "There is not a liberal America and a conservative America— there is the United States of America." In a single speech, Obama became the vessel for a generation's longing.

"Yes We Can" was not a policy platform. It was a feeling. And for Black Americans—95% of whom voted for him in 2008—his election wasn't just politics. It was personal. It was historical. It was the fulfillment of a promise that many had stopped believing was possible.

The Tell

Obama's 2008 campaign received $994,795 from Goldman Sachs employees—his second-largest donor. JP Morgan: $581,460. Citigroup: $581,216. Combined, more than $2.5 million from just three Wall Street banks.

Yes, you read that correctly. The same banks that built the instruments that destroyed the economy funded the candidacy of the man who promised to fix it.

The Betrayal

The TARP vote. On October 1, 2008, one month before the election, Senator Barack Obama voted YES on the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, creating TARP: a $700 billion bailout for the banks that had just crashed the economy. Senator John McCain, his Republican opponent, also voted yes. So did Senator Joe Biden. So did Senator Hillary Clinton.

The overwhelming majority of Americans opposed the bailout. Senator Dianne Feinstein's office alone received 39,180 contacts from constituents, the vast majority against.

Both presidential candidates, supposedly running against each other, voted identically to protect Wall Street, against the expressed will of the American people. If they served different masters, they had a funny way of showing it.

Foam the runway: Obama's foreclosure "relief" program—the Home Affordable Modification Program, HAMP—was sold to the public as help for homeowners facing foreclosure.

It wasn't. Neil Barofsky, the Special Inspector General for TARP, documented what actually happened.

In a meeting with Elizabeth Warren, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner explained the program's true purpose: to "foam the runway" for the banks, i.e. spreading out foreclosures so banks could absorb them more slowly.

"Homeowners are the foam being crushed by a jumbo jet," wrote The Atlantic. The program wasn't designed to save homes. It was designed to save banks. 9.3 million American families lost their homes to foreclosure between 2006 and 2014.

The impact on Black America was catastrophic. African Americans lost approximately half their wealth in the housing crisis.

Black homeownership fell from a high of 50% in 2004 to a projected 40%. For most Black families, wealth was concentrated in home equity. When home values collapsed and never recovered, an entire generation of wealth-building was erased.

The first Black president presided over the greatest destruction of Black wealth in modern American history. And his Treasury Secretary admitted, on the record, that the "relief" program was designed to protect banks, not families.

Zero prosecutions: Not a single senior Wall Street executive was criminally prosecuted for the fraud that caused the 2008 crisis. Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, came from Covington & Burling, a law firm that represented major banks. He returned to the firm after leaving office.

The architecture protected the architects. The legal framework—UCC Article 8, the safe harbor and the CFMA—ensured that what Wall Street did was, technically, legal. And the administration of "Hope and Change" didn't even try to change that.

The Reputation

Barack Obama left office with approximately 59% approval. He was named Gallup's "Most Admired Man" for twelve consecutive years. Post-presidency he received a $65 million book deal, a $50 million Netflix deal and a compound on Martha's Vineyard.

The community organizer from the South Side whose Treasury Secretary designed foreclosure "relief" as a bank protection program, who presided over the destruction of half of Black American wealth, and who prosecuted zero Wall Street executives  is the most admired man in America.

The con works when the performance is this good.

Joe Biden: The Adult in the Room

The Performance

Joe Biden's 2020 campaign was the simplest pitch in modern politics: I'm the adult. I'll fix this. And then I'll step aside.

"I view myself as a bridge, not as anything else," he said at a Michigan rally in March 2020, with Kamala Harris and Cory Booker at his side. As early as December 2019, he signaled to aides that he would serve only a single term.

"Scranton Joe." The kid from a working-class Pennsylvania family. The man who lost his first wife and daughter. The Amtrak commuter. He was the lunch-pail Democrat who understood your kitchen-table struggles because he'd lived them.

Americans didn't vote for Biden in 2020. They voted against Trump. Biden offered himself as the off-ramp. He was the safe, boring and experienced hand who'd restore normalcy. He wasn’t a movement, but a sedative.

The Hidden Resume

What "Scranton Joe" obscured was a fifty-year record that belonged in this article long before Biden became president.

Biden entered the United States Senate in 1973. By 2020, he had spent forty-seven years in the federal government. There is no outsider with a longer inside track.

He was known in Washington as "the Senator from MBNA",  a nickname earned through decades of service to Delaware's credit card industry. MBNA, headquartered in Wilmington, was among his largest donors starting in 1989. They hired his son Hunter in 1996 at over $100,000 per year.

In 1994, it was Biden, while serving as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who wrote and championed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. The crime bill described in the Clinton section of this article. Biden didn't vote for it. He authored it.³⁸

In 2005, Biden was one of only eighteen Democrats to vote for the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act—the bill that made it harder for working families to discharge credit card debt, while hiding the safe harbor provisions that completed the legal architecture for the 2008 crash. 

Bill Clinton had vetoed the same bill in 2000. Leading Democrats and consumer rights organizations opposed it.

In 2002, as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden helped build bipartisan support for the Iraq War authorization.

And in 2008, Senator Biden voted for TARP. This is the man who ran as the working-class alternative to Donald Trump.

The Betrayal

The first broken promise: In the lead-up to Georgia's January 5, 2021 Senate runoff—the election that would determine whether Democrats controlled the Senate—Biden, Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock explicitly promised $2,000 stimulus checks. Biden said they would "go out the door immediately."

Democrats won. The checks arrived at $1,400. The administration claimed Trump's earlier $600 payment was a "down payment" on the $2,000. Georgia voters called it, in the words of one Mediaite headline, "a betrayal."

The first major action of Biden's presidency was a broken promise to the voters who had just delivered him power.

The minimum wage: Biden campaigned on a $15 federal minimum wage. When the Senate parliamentarian ruled it couldn't be included in the reconciliation bill, Biden accepted the ruling despite the Vice President's constitutional authority to overrule the parliamentarian, and despite historical precedent for replacing one. 

The federal minimum wage has been $7.25 per hour since 2009 and remained unchanged through the entirety of Biden's presidency. 

The child poverty betrayal: The expanded Child Tax Credit, part of Biden's American Rescue Plan, cut child poverty to a record low of 5.2% in 2021. It was the single most effective anti-poverty policy in a generation. 

Then Congress allowed it to expire. Child poverty more than doubled in 2022—the steepest recorded rise. Biden blamed congressional Republicans, but Democrats controlled both chambers through January 2023.

Student loan theater: Biden used the HEROES Act—COVID emergency authority—to announce $430 billion in student loan cancellation. Multiple advisors reportedly warned that this legal pathway was vulnerable. 

The Department of Education had existing authority under the Higher Education Act that would have been on stronger legal ground. The Supreme Court struck it down 6-3 in Biden v. Nebraska.

The bitter irony: Biden himself championed the 2005 bankruptcy bill that made student loans virtually impossible to discharge in bankruptcy, trapping the same borrowers he later promised to help.

The bridge to nowhere: In 2023, despite mounting evidence of cognitive decline, Biden announced his reelection campaign. The man who promised to be a one-term bridge refused to honor the promise. 

After a devastating debate performance on June 27, 2024, donors pulled funding, party leaders applied pressure and Biden finally dropped out on July 21. There was no competitive primary. Kamala Harris was installed as the nominee without a single primary vote cast in her name.

Harris lost and Trump won every major demographic trend compared to 2020.

The man who was elected to prevent Trump's return instead ensured it—first by blocking the bridge he promised to be, then by handing the keys too late to a successor who was never tested.

The Final Act

On January 13, 2025—one week before leaving office—President Biden announced the naming of two new Ford-class aircraft carriers: the USS William J. Clinton and the USS George W. Bush.

Clinton and Bush. Named together. By Biden. On aircraft carriers, the most potent symbols of American military-industrial power.

The "adult in the room" spent his last week in office consecrating the two presidents whose policies—which he voted for, at every step—dismantled the economic security of the working class he claimed to champion.

The Inevitable Result

Four presidents. Four identities. Four betrayals. And here's the part that should keep you up at night: it completely worked on the vast majority of us.

Bill Clinton is still revered. Bush's approval went from 33% to 61%. Obama is the most admired man in America. And Biden is already being reconstituted as the elder statesman who "did his duty."

The performance is so good that the betrayal never fully registers. The identity is so powerful that it survives the evidence.

This is not about Democrat versus Republican. Clinton and Obama were Democrats. Bush was a Republican. Biden built a fifty-year career in the space between. All four governed for the same interests. All four were funded by the same institutions. 

And when it was over, a Democratic president named aircraft carriers after a Democrat and a Republican—together—because at the level where real power operates, the distinction doesn't exist.

By now you should uderstand that the question is not how a person like Donald Trump—a political outsider with questionable morals and rap sheet of bankruptcies and failed businesses—could ever be elected. It should be why it took this long for the pattern to produce him. 

When every president—regardless of party or persona—runs the same con, eventually the electorate doesn't just lose faith. They’ll burn the house down.

Kevin Howard

CONTRIBUTOR

Kevin Howard is a U.S. Army veteran and former FEMA Lead Disaster Assistance Loan Officer who spent 25 years building a successful career in commercial banking before pivoting to climate risk and sustainability advisory work. In February 2023, he founded Climate Changes Everything, LLC, where he advises on the intersection of finance, resilience, and systemic risk.

His book, Onward, At Last, published by Atmosphere Press, was re-released in October 2024 as a Presidential Election edition featuring a foreword by John Fullerton. The book received the 2025 Bronze IPPY Award for Best Adult Non-Fiction eBook from the Independent Book Publishers Awards.

In October 2025, Howard launched Breadcrumbs, a podcast for people who sense that “it is not working” and are searching for clearer ways forward.